Radeon PRO W7700 vs Mobility HD 4850

Place in performance ranking	906	40
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.16	25.99
Architecture	Terascale 1 (2008−2010)	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	M98	Navi 32
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	9 January 2009 (15 years ago)	13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999
Current price	$187	$999 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7700 has 16144% better value for money than ATI Mobility HD 4850.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	800	3072
Core clock speed	500 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	956 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.00	499.2
Floating-point performance	800.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Mobility Radeon HD 4850 and Radeon PRO W7700 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	850 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	54.4 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.7
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−3193%

1350−1400
+3193%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
−3150%

130−140

+3150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −3067%	95−100 +3067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −3100%	160−170 +3100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3150%	130−140 +3150%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −3150%	65−70 +3150%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −3150%	130−140 +3150%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −3100%	160−170 +3100%
Hitman 3	4−5 −3150%	130−140 +3150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −2900%	450−500 +2900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −3067%	95−100 +3067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −3122%	290−300 +3122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −2817%	350−400 +2817%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −3067%	95−100 +3067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −3100%	160−170 +3100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3150%	130−140 +3150%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −3150%	65−70 +3150%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −3150%	130−140 +3150%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −3100%	160−170 +3100%
Hitman 3	4−5 −3150%	130−140 +3150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −2900%	450−500 +2900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −3067%	95−100 +3067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −3122%	290−300 +3122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −3100%	160−170 +3100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −2817%	350−400 +2817%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −3067%	95−100 +3067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −3100%	160−170 +3100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3150%	130−140 +3150%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −3150%	65−70 +3150%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −3100%	160−170 +3100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −2900%	450−500 +2900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −3122%	290−300 +3122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −3100%	160−170 +3100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −2817%	350−400 +2817%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−3067%

95−100
+3067%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −3150%	65−70 +3150%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −3150%	130−140 +3150%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −3150%	65−70 +3150%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −3150%	65−70 +3150%
Hitman 3	7−8 −3186%	230−240 +3186%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −3100%	160−170 +3100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
−3150%

130−140

+3150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −3150%	65−70 +3150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −3150%	65−70 +3150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −3150%	65−70 +3150%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −3150%	130−140 +3150%