Quadro FX 350 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4830 with Quadro FX 350, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 4830
2009
1 GB GDDR5
1.29
+545%

Mobility HD 4830 outperforms FX 350 by a whopping 545% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10651442
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.73
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameM97G72
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 March 2009 (16 years ago)20 April 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed550 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors826 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data21 Watt
Texture fill rate17.602.200
Floating-point processing power0.704 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs324
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz405 MHz
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/s6.48 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.13.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Fortnite 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Valorant 30−35
+580%
5−6
−580%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Fortnite 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Valorant 30−35
+580%
5−6
−580%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Valorant 30−35
+580%
5−6
−580%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Valorant 4−5 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Valorant 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.29 0.20
Recency 3 March 2009 20 April 2006
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm

ATI Mobility HD 4830 has a 545% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

The Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 350 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830
Mobility Radeon HD 4830
NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
Quadro FX 350

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 5 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4830 or Quadro FX 350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.