Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4830 and Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU outperforms Mobility HD 4830 by a whopping 801% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1072 | 454 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | no data |
| GPU code name | M97 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 3 March 2009 (17 years ago) | 5 January 2026 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2450 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 826 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 17.60 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.704 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | no data |
| TMUs | 32 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 44.8 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | no data |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | no data |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 3−4
−1000%
| 33
+1000%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−700%
|
24−27
+700%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 0−1 | 24−27 |
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−5100%
|
50−55
+5100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−700%
|
24−27
+700%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−1167%
|
35−40
+1167%
|
| Fortnite | 4−5
−1625%
|
65−70
+1625%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−525%
|
50−55
+525%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
−1700%
|
35−40
+1700%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−378%
|
40−45
+378%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−212%
|
100−110
+212%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−5100%
|
50−55
+5100%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−33
−463%
|
160−170
+463%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−700%
|
24−27
+700%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−782%
|
150−160
+782%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−1167%
|
35−40
+1167%
|
| Fortnite | 4−5
−1625%
|
65−70
+1625%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−525%
|
50−55
+525%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
−1700%
|
35−40
+1700%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 0−1 | 37 |
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−1100%
|
24−27
+1100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−378%
|
40−45
+378%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−343%
|
30−35
+343%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−212%
|
100−110
+212%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−5100%
|
50−55
+5100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−700%
|
24−27
+700%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−782%
|
150−160
+782%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−1167%
|
35−40
+1167%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−525%
|
50−55
+525%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−378%
|
40−45
+378%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−343%
|
30−35
+343%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−782%
|
300−310
+782%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 4−5
−1625%
|
65−70
+1625%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−450%
|
21−24
+450%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 9−10
−889%
|
85−90
+889%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−746%
|
110−120
+746%
|
| Valorant | 4−5
−3050%
|
120−130
+3050%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−2400%
|
24−27
+2400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−833%
|
27−30
+833%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−750%
|
16−18
+750%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−1150%
|
24−27
+1150%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−64.3%
|
21−24
+64.3%
|
| Valorant | 6−7
−950%
|
60−65
+950%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 1−2
−800%
|
9−10
+800%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−450%
|
10−12
+450%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−450%
|
10−12
+450%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Counter-Strike 2 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
This is how ATI Mobility HD 4830 and Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU compete in popular games:
- Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 1000% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 5100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU performs better in 38 tests (75%)
- there's a draw in 13 tests (25%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.29 | 11.62 |
| Recency | 3 March 2009 | 5 January 2026 |
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU has a 800.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 16 years.
The Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4830 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
