GeForce RTX 3080 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4830
Aggregated performance score
GeForce RTX 3080 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 4830 by a whopping 4817% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 981 | 23 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 23.51 |
| Architecture | Terascale 1 (2008−2010) | Ampere (2020−2022) |
| GPU code name | M97 | Ampere GA102 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 3 March 2009 (15 years ago) | 16 September 2020 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $699 |
| Current price | no data | $823 (1.2x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 8704 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 1450 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1710 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 826 million | 28,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 320 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 465.1 |
| Floating-point performance | 704.0 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Mobility Radeon HD 4830 and GeForce RTX 3080 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 285 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 12-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR6X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 10 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | 19000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 44.8 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| CUDA | no data | 8.5 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce RTX 3080 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 4830 by 4817% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
GeForce RTX 3080 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 4830 by 2275% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 3−4
−5367%
| 164
+5367%
|
| 1440p | 2−3
−6000%
| 122
+6000%
|
| 4K | 1−2
−8400%
| 85
+8400%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−3075%
|
120−130
+3075%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
−1756%
|
160−170
+1756%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−3350%
|
138
+3350%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−18200%
|
180−190
+18200%
|
| Hitman 3 | 1−2
−17100%
|
172
+17100%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−16500%
|
166
+16500%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−3700%
|
152
+3700%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−2671%
|
194
+2671%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
−1756%
|
160−170
+1756%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−3250%
|
134
+3250%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−18200%
|
180−190
+18200%
|
| Hitman 3 | 1−2
−16600%
|
167
+16600%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−14800%
|
149
+14800%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−6300%
|
128
+6300%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−2875%
|
119
+2875%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−2571%
|
187
+2571%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−7475%
|
303
+7475%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−3175%
|
131
+3175%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−18200%
|
180−190
+18200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−3625%
|
149
+3625%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−3833%
|
110−120
+3833%
|
| Hitman 3 | 4−5
−4000%
|
164
+4000%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−1538%
|
131
+1538%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 84 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
−2900%
|
150
+2900%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−8500%
|
86
+8500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−6650%
|
135
+6650%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−5750%
|
110−120
+5750%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−3500%
|
70−75
+3500%
|
| Hitman 3 | 1−2
−10800%
|
109
+10800%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
−529%
|
44
+529%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 56 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 52 |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−3033%
|
94
+3033%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−1680%
|
89
+1680%
|
This is how ATI Mobility HD 4830 and RTX 3080 compete in popular games:
- RTX 3080 is 5367% faster in 1080p
- RTX 3080 is 6000% faster in 1440p
- RTX 3080 is 8400% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3080 is 18200% faster than the ATI Mobility HD 4830.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RTX 3080 surpassed ATI Mobility HD 4830 in all 32 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.33 | 65.40 |
| Recency | 3 March 2009 | 16 September 2020 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 10 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 8 nm |
The GeForce RTX 3080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4830 in performance tests.
Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3080 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
