GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4670 with GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 4670
2009
512 MB GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3, 35 Watt
1.22

RTX 3050 8 GB outperforms ATI Mobility HD 4670 by a whopping 2580% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1052163
Place by popularitynot in top-10011
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data69.29
ArchitectureTerascale 1 (2008−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameM96-XTGA106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2009 (15 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3202560
Core clock speed675 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1777 MHz
Number of transistors514 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate21.60142.2
Floating-point processing power0.432 gflops9.098 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3, DDR2, DDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2400%
350−400
+2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2525%
210−220
+2525%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2556%
850−900
+2556%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2400%
350−400
+2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2525%
210−220
+2525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−2536%
290−300
+2536%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2556%
850−900
+2556%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2400%
350−400
+2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2525%
210−220
+2525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−2536%
290−300
+2536%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2556%
850−900
+2556%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Hitman 3 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.22 32.70
Recency 9 January 2009 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 130 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 4670 has 271.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 8 GB, on the other hand, has a 2580.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 13 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 11621 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.