ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs ATI Mobility HD 4570

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4570 with Radeon HD 2900 XT, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 4570
2009
512 MB GDDR3
0.35

ATI HD 2900 XT outperforms ATI Mobility HD 4570 by a whopping 386% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1304939
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.05
Power efficiencyno data0.55
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameM92R600
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2009 (16 years ago)14 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80320
Core clock speed680 MHz743 MHz
Number of transistors242 million720 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data215 Watt
Texture fill rate5.44011.89
Floating-point processing power0.1088 TFLOPS0.4755 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz828 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s106.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Valorant 24−27
−362%
120−130
+362%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Dota 2 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Valorant 24−27
−362%
120−130
+362%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Dota 2 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Valorant 24−27
−362%
120−130
+362%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−367%
70−75
+367%
Valorant 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 1.70
Recency 9 January 2009 14 May 2007
Chip lithography 55 nm 80 nm

ATI Mobility HD 4570 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 2900 XT, on the other hand, has a 385.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon HD 2900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4570 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4570 is a notebook card while Radeon HD 2900 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
Mobility Radeon HD 4570
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
Radeon HD 2900 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 55 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 64 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4570 or Radeon HD 2900 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.