RTX A2000 Embedded vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4570 with RTX A2000 Embedded, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 4570
2009
512 MB GDDR3
0.33

RTX A2000 Embedded outperforms Mobility HD 4570 by a whopping 7955% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1369244
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data58.48
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameM92GA107S
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date9 January 2009 (17 years ago)30 March 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores802560
Core clock speed680 MHz607 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1177 MHz
Number of transistors242 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rate5.44094.16
Floating-point processing power0.1088 TFLOPS6.026 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache16 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache64 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−7757%
550−600
+7757%
Valorant 24−27
−7785%
2050−2100
+7785%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−7757%
1100−1150
+7757%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
Dota 2 10−11
−7900%
800−850
+7900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−7757%
550−600
+7757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
Valorant 24−27
−7785%
2050−2100
+7785%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
Dota 2 10−11
−7900%
800−850
+7900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−7757%
550−600
+7757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
Valorant 24−27
−7785%
2050−2100
+7785%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−7900%
240−250
+7900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−7757%
1100−1150
+7757%
Valorant 2−3
−7900%
160−170
+7900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−7900%
160−170
+7900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 26.58
Recency 9 January 2009 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm

RTX A2000 Embedded has a 7955% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 588% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A2000 Embedded is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4570 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4570 is a notebook graphics card while RTX A2000 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 65 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4570 or RTX A2000 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.