Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4570 with Quadro P3200 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 4570
2009
512 MB GDDR3
0.33

P3200 Max-Q outperforms Mobility HD 4570 by a whopping 6506% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1368293
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.35
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameM92GP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date9 January 2009 (17 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores801792
Core clock speed680 MHz1139 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1404 MHz
Number of transistors242 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rate5.440157.2
Floating-point processing power0.1088 TFLOPS5.032 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8112
L1 Cache16 KB672 KB
L2 Cache64 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s168.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−5900%
300−310
+5900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−6400%
260−270
+6400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−5900%
300−310
+5900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−6329%
450−500
+6329%
Valorant 24−27
−6438%
1700−1750
+6438%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−6329%
900−950
+6329%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Dota 2 10−11
−6400%
650−700
+6400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−6400%
260−270
+6400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−5900%
300−310
+5900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−6329%
450−500
+6329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−5900%
300−310
+5900%
Valorant 24−27
−6438%
1700−1750
+6438%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Dota 2 10−11
−6400%
650−700
+6400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−6400%
260−270
+6400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−5900%
300−310
+5900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−6329%
450−500
+6329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−5900%
300−310
+5900%
Valorant 24−27
−6438%
1700−1750
+6438%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−6233%
190−200
+6233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−6400%
260−270
+6400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6329%
900−950
+6329%
Valorant 2−3
−6400%
130−140
+6400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−6400%
130−140
+6400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 21.80
Recency 9 January 2009 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 16 nm

P3200 Max-Q has a 6506.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 243.8% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4570 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4570 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
Mobility Radeon HD 4570
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 65 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 27 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4570 or Quadro P3200 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.