Arc B580 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4570 with Arc B580, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 4570
2009
512 MB GDDR3
0.35

Arc B580 outperforms ATI Mobility HD 4570 by a whopping 11377% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1304107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data94.05
Power efficiencyno data14.52
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Xe2 (2025)
GPU code nameM92BMG-G21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2009 (16 years ago)16 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores802560
Core clock speed680 MHz2670 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2670 MHz
Number of transistors242 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data190 Watt
Texture fill rate5.440427.2
Floating-point processing power0.1088 TFLOPS13.67 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs8160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s456.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−12500%
126
+12500%
1440p0−168
4K-0−141

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.98
1440pno data3.66
4Kno data6.07

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−20500%
206
+20500%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1943%
143
+1943%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−11100%
112
+11100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−14700%
148
+14700%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1571%
117
+1571%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9600%
97
+9600%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4700%
140−150
+4700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2014%
140−150
+2014%
Valorant 24−27
−742%
210−220
+742%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−10000%
101
+10000%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1386%
104
+1386%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−1886%
270−280
+1886%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8100%
82
+8100%
Dota 2 10−11
−10900%
1100−1150
+10900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4700%
140−150
+4700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2014%
140−150
+2014%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−5800%
236
+5800%
Valorant 24−27
−742%
210−220
+742%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1257%
95
+1257%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7600%
77
+7600%
Dota 2 10−11
−10900%
1100−1150
+10900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4700%
140−150
+4700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2014%
140−150
+2014%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2025%
85
+2025%
Valorant 24−27
−742%
210−220
+742%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−8650%
170−180
+8650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 56
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−10400%
100−110
+10400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6700%
68
+6700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 95−100

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 30−33
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−420%
78
+420%
Valorant 2−3
−11250%
220−230
+11250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−5800%
59
+5800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2300%
45−50
+2300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 193
+0%
193
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 160
+0%
160
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 174
+0%
174
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 140
+0%
140
+0%
Metro Exodus 106
+0%
106
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 149
+0%
149
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
+0%
69
+0%
Metro Exodus 62
+0%
62
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 110
+0%
110
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 46
+0%
46
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+0%
84
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14
+0%
14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4570 and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc B580 is 12500% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc B580 is 20500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc B580 is ahead in 31 test (53%)
  • there's a draw in 27 tests (47%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 40.17
Recency 9 January 2009 16 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm

Arc B580 has a 11377.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4570 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4570 is a notebook card while Arc B580 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
Mobility Radeon HD 4570
Intel Arc B580
Arc B580

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 55 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 482 votes

Rate Arc B580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4570 or Arc B580, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.