Arc B580 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570

Place in the ranking	1290	100
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	94.85
Power efficiency	no data	14.79
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Xe2 (2024)
GPU code name	M92	BMG-G21
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	9 January 2009 (16 years ago)	12 December 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	2560
Core clock speed	680 MHz	2670 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2670 MHz
Number of transistors	242 million	19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	5.440	427.2
Floating-point processing power	0.1088 TFLOPS	13.67 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	80
TMUs	8	160
Tensor Cores	no data	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	272 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	12 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	12.8 GB/s	456.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.6
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1−2 −12300%	124 +12300%
1440p	0−1	69
4K	-0−1	43

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.01
1440p	no data	3.61
4K	no data	5.79

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−11400%

230−240
+11400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −9900%	300−310 +9900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −11400%	230−240 +11400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −11400%	230−240 +11400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −11150%	450−500 +11150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −11150%	900−950 +11150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −11150%	450−500 +11150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −11507%	3250−3300 +11507%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −9900%	300−310 +9900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −11400%	230−240 +11400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −11400%	230−240 +11400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −11150%	450−500 +11150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −11150%	900−950 +11150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −11150%	450−500 +11150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −11011%	1000−1050 +11011%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −11507%	3250−3300 +11507%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −9900%	300−310 +9900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −11400%	230−240 +11400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −11400%	230−240 +11400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −11150%	450−500 +11150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −11150%	900−950 +11150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −11150%	450−500 +11150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −11011%	1000−1050 +11011%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −11507%	3250−3300 +11507%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −10733%	650−700 +10733%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −11400%	230−240 +11400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−11400%

230−240
+11400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −10900%	110−120 +10900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−11400%

230−240
+11400%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4570 and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

Arc B580 is 12300% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.35	40.68
Recency	9 January 2009	12 December 2024
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	12 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	5 nm

Arc B580 has a 11522.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4570 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4570 is a notebook card while Arc B580 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.