Radeon Graphics vs ATI Mobility HD 4550

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4550 with Radeon Graphics, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 4550
2010
512 MB GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3
0.33

Graphics outperforms ATI Mobility HD 4550 by a whopping 500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1300897
Place by popularitynot in top-10010
Power efficiencyno data9.20
ArchitectureTerascale 1 (2010)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameM92Renoir
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 January 2010 (14 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80448
Core clock speed550 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors242 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate4.40042.00
Floating-point processing power0.088 TFLOPS1.344 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs828

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIIGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3, DDR2, DDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−500%
60−65
+500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Hitman 3 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−471%
160−170
+471%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Hitman 3 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−471%
160−170
+471%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Hitman 3 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−471%
160−170
+471%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4550 and Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Graphics is 500% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 1.98
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm

Graphics has a 500% higher aggregate performance score, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4550 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4550 is a notebook card while Radeon Graphics is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550
Mobility Radeon HD 4550
AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 35 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6243 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.