Quadro RTX 6000 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550

Place in the ranking	1302	69
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	5.32
Power efficiency	no data	12.78
Architecture	Terascale 1 (2010)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	M92	TU102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	1 January 2010 (14 years ago)	13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$6,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	4608
Core clock speed	550 MHz	1440 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	242 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	260 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.400	509.8
Floating-point processing power	0.088 TFLOPS	16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	96
TMUs	8	288
Tensor Cores	no data	576
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	24 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	700 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	11.2 GB/s	672.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.5
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−14400%

1450−1500
+14400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

4.34

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−14400%

290−300
+14400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −13233%	400−450 +13233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −14400%	290−300 +14400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −14400%	290−300 +14400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −13650%	550−600 +13650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −14275%	1150−1200 +14275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −13650%	550−600 +13650%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −14543%	4100−4150 +14543%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −13233%	400−450 +13233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −14400%	290−300 +14400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −14400%	290−300 +14400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −13650%	550−600 +13650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −14275%	1150−1200 +14275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −13650%	550−600 +13650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −14344%	1300−1350 +14344%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −14543%	4100−4150 +14543%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −13233%	400−450 +13233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −14400%	290−300 +14400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −14400%	290−300 +14400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −13650%	550−600 +13650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −14275%	1150−1200 +14275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −13650%	550−600 +13650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −14344%	1300−1350 +14344%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −14543%	4100−4150 +14543%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −14067%	850−900 +14067%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −14400%	290−300 +14400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−14400%

290−300
+14400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −13900%	140−150 +13900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−14400%

290−300
+14400%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4550 and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

RTX 6000 is 14400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.33	48.46
Recency	1 January 2010	13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	24 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	12 nm

RTX 6000 has a 14584.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4550 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4550 is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.