Quadro NVS 290 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4550 with Quadro NVS 290, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 4550
2010
512 MB GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3
0.35

NVS 290 outperforms Mobility HD 4550 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13521282
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Power efficiencyno data2.02
ArchitectureTerascale 1 (2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameM92G86
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 January 2010 (16 years ago)4 October 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8016
Core clock speed550 MHz459 MHz
Number of transistors242 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data21 Watt
Texture fill rate4.4003.672
Floating-point processing power0.088 TFLOPS0.02938 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cacheno data16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3, DDR2, DDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−40%
14−16
+40%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data10.64

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Valorant 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Valorant 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Valorant 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Valorant 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4550 and NVS 290 compete in popular games:

  • NVS 290 is 40% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 0.55
Recency 1 January 2010 4 October 2007
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 80 nm

ATI Mobility HD 4550 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 45% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 290, on the other hand, has a 57% higher aggregate performance score.

The Quadro NVS 290 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4550 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4550 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro NVS 290 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 37 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 23 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4550 or Quadro NVS 290, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.