P106-100 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4550 with P106-100, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 4550
2010
512 MB GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3
0.35

P106-100 outperforms Mobility HD 4550 by a whopping 4480% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1352366
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data10.29
ArchitectureTerascale 1 (2010)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameM92GP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 January 2010 (16 years ago)19 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores801280
Core clock speed550 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1709 MHz
Number of transistors242 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt
Texture fill rate4.400136.7
Floating-point processing power0.088 TFLOPS4.375 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs880
L1 Cacheno data480 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3, DDR2, DDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−4400%
450−500
+4400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Valorant 24−27
−4323%
1150−1200
+4323%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−4186%
600−650
+4186%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Dota 2 10−11
−4400%
450−500
+4400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−4300%
220−230
+4300%
Valorant 24−27
−4323%
1150−1200
+4323%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Dota 2 10−11
−4400%
450−500
+4400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−4300%
220−230
+4300%
Valorant 24−27
−4323%
1150−1200
+4323%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−4186%
600−650
+4186%
Valorant 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4550 and P106-100 compete in popular games:

  • P106-100 is 4400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 16.03
Recency 1 January 2010 19 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 16 nm

P106-100 has a 4480% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 244% more advanced lithography process.

The P106-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4550 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4550 is a notebook graphics card while P106-100 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 37 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 387 votes

Rate P106-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4550 or P106-100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.