RTX 5880 Ada Generation vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4530 with RTX 5880 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.


ATI Mobility HD 4530
2009
512 MB GDDR3
0.35

RTX 5880 Ada Generation outperforms Mobility HD 4530 by a whopping 17046% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking135041
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.21
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameM92AD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date9 January 2009 (17 years ago)5 January 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8014080
Core clock speed500 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2460 MHz
Number of transistors242 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data285 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0001,082
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS69.27 TFLOPS
ROPs4176
TMUs8440
Tensor Coresno data440
Ray Tracing Coresno data110
L1 Cache16 KB13.8 MB
L2 Cache64 KB72 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−16900%
170−180
+16900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−16900%
170−180
+16900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−16150%
650−700
+16150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−17043%
1200−1250
+17043%
Valorant 24−27
−17015%
4450−4500
+17015%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−17043%
2400−2450
+17043%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−16900%
170−180
+16900%
Dota 2 10−11
−16900%
1700−1750
+16900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−16150%
650−700
+16150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−17043%
1200−1250
+17043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−16900%
850−900
+16900%
Valorant 24−27
−17015%
4450−4500
+17015%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−16900%
170−180
+16900%
Dota 2 10−11
−16900%
1700−1750
+16900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−16150%
650−700
+16150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−17043%
1200−1250
+17043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−16900%
850−900
+16900%
Valorant 24−27
−17015%
4450−4500
+17015%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−16567%
500−550
+16567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−16900%
170−180
+16900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−16150%
650−700
+16150%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−16900%
170−180
+16900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−16900%
170−180
+16900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−17043%
2400−2450
+17043%
Valorant 2−3
−14900%
300−310
+14900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−16900%
170−180
+16900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−14900%
300−310
+14900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 60.01
Recency 9 January 2009 5 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm

RTX 5880 Ada Generation has a 17046% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4530 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4530 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 5880 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 22 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 23 votes

Rate RTX 5880 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4530 or RTX 5880 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.