Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4530

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4530 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 4530
2009
512 MB GDDR3
0.36

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms ATI Mobility HD 4530 by a whopping 2783% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1290441
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameM92Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 January 2009 (16 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores804
Core clock speed500 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1950 MHz
Number of transistors242 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Texture fill rate4.000no data
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed700 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12_2
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−125

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−117%
13
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−83.3%
11
+83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−733%
50
+733%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−117%
13
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−243%
24
+243%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−550%
39
+550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−520%
30−35
+520%
World of Tanks 12−14
−1038%
140−150
+1038%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−400%
30
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Valorant 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 9−10
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Dota 2 14−16
−2567%
400−450
+2567%
Valorant 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 15
+0%
15
+0%
Elden Ring 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Elden Ring 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
World of Tanks 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Elden Ring 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 2350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is ahead in 23 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 33 tests (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 10.38
Recency 9 January 2009 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 2783.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4530 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4530
Mobility Radeon HD 4530
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 18 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 10 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.