UHD Graphics vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330

Place in the ranking	1302	606
Place by popularity	not in top-100	5
Power efficiency	no data	38.57
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code name	M92	Jasper Lake GT1
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	9 January 2009 (16 years ago)	11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	256
Core clock speed	450 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	750 MHz
Number of transistors	242 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	10 Watt
Texture fill rate	3.600	12.00
Floating-point processing power	0.072 TFLOPS	0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	8
TMUs	8	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

PCIe 2.0 x16

Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	600 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	9.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1525%	130−140 +1525%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1525%	130−140 +1525%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1500%	80−85 +1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1525%	65−70 +1525%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1525%	130−140 +1525%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1483%	95−100 +1483%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1500%	80−85 +1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −1471%	110−120 +1471%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1525%	65−70 +1525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −1500%	80−85 +1500%
World of Tanks	12−14 −1515%	210−220 +1515%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1525%	130−140 +1525%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1483%	95−100 +1483%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1500%	80−85 +1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −1471%	110−120 +1471%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

−1400%

30−33
+1400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1456%	140−150 +1456%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1525%	65−70 +1525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Valorant	5−6 −1500%	80−85 +1500%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −1500%	240−250 +1500%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −1500%	240−250 +1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −1500%	240−250 +1500%