Radeon RX 7900M vs ATI Mobility HD 4330
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4330 and Radeon RX 7900M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
7900M outperforms Mobility HD 4330 by a whopping 16422% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1379 | 64 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 22.62 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) |
| GPU code name | M92 | Navi 31 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 9 January 2009 (17 years ago) | 19 October 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 80 | 4608 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 1825 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2090 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 242 million | 57,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 180 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 3.600 | 601.9 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.072 TFLOPS | 38.52 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 192 |
| TMUs | 8 | 288 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 72 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 2.3 MB |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 64 KB | 6 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 64 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 600 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB/s | 576.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 0−1 | 148 |
| 1440p | 0−1 | 107 |
| 4K | -0−1 | 73 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−12900%
|
130−140
+12900%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−12900%
|
130−140
+12900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−5050%
|
200−210
+5050%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−2386%
|
170−180
+2386%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−1027%
|
290−300
+1027%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16
−1893%
|
270−280
+1893%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−12900%
|
130−140
+12900%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−11
−16400%
|
1650−1700
+16400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−5050%
|
200−210
+5050%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−2386%
|
170−180
+2386%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−4180%
|
210−220
+4180%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−1027%
|
290−300
+1027%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−13400%
|
135
+13400%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−11
−16400%
|
1650−1700
+16400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−5050%
|
200−210
+5050%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−2386%
|
170−180
+2386%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−3260%
|
168
+3260%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−1027%
|
290−300
+1027%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−4967%
|
150−160
+4967%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 0−1 | 350−400 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−5733%
|
170−180
+5733%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−16700%
|
160−170
+16700%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−11500%
|
110−120
+11500%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−943%
|
146
+943%
|
| Valorant | 2−3
−15200%
|
300−350
+15200%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−9100%
|
90−95
+9100%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−3800%
|
75−80
+3800%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 270−280
+0%
|
270−280
+0%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 270−280
+0%
|
270−280
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 230−240
+0%
|
230−240
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 270−280
+0%
|
270−280
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 230−240
+0%
|
230−240
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 139
+0%
|
139
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 128
+0%
|
128
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 230−240
+0%
|
230−240
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 106
+0%
|
106
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
| Valorant | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 93
+0%
|
93
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 123
+0%
|
123
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 116
+0%
|
116
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 44
+0%
|
44
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 103
+0%
|
103
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900M is 16700% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 7900M performs better in 24 tests (43%)
- there's a draw in 32 tests (57%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.32 | 52.87 |
| Recency | 9 January 2009 | 19 October 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 5 nm |
RX 7900M has a 16422% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 7900M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
