GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4330 with GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 4330
2009
512 MB GDDR3
0.29

RTX 3090 Ti outperforms ATI Mobility HD 4330 by a whopping 22731% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking131314
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.31
Power efficiencyno data11.71
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameM92GA102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2009 (16 years ago)27 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8010752
Core clock speed450 MHz1560 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1860 MHz
Number of transistors242 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data450 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600625.0
Floating-point processing power0.072 TFLOPS40 TFLOPS
ROPs4112
TMUs8336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data336 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s1,008 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1208
1440p0−1142
4K-0−1101

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data9.61
1440pno data14.08
4Kno data19.79

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−10750%
210−220
+10750%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−21800%
219
+21800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−10750%
210−220
+10750%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−20000%
201
+20000%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−9500%
280−290
+9500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2429%
170−180
+2429%
Valorant 24−27
−1512%
400−450
+1512%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−10750%
210−220
+10750%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−2038%
270−280
+2038%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−17200%
173
+17200%
Dota 2 10−11
−2070%
217
+2070%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−9500%
280−290
+9500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2429%
170−180
+2429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−9750%
394
+9750%
Valorant 24−27
−1512%
400−450
+1512%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−15100%
152
+15100%
Dota 2 10−11
−1850%
195
+1850%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−9500%
280−290
+9500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2429%
170−180
+2429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−4725%
193
+4725%
Valorant 24−27
−1512%
400−450
+1512%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−5733%
170−180
+5733%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 104
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−25200%
250−260
+25200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 170−180

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 150−160

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1107%
181
+1107%
Valorant 2−3
−16500%
300−350
+16500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−11700%
110−120
+11700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4700%
95−100
+4700%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Far Cry 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 200
+0%
200
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Far Cry 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 188
+0%
188
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 170
+0%
170
+0%
Metro Exodus 178
+0%
178
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Far Cry 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 151
+0%
151
+0%
Metro Exodus 125
+0%
125
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 84
+0%
84
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 173
+0%
173
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 53
+0%
53
+0%
Dota 2 184
+0%
184
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3090 Ti is 25200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3090 Ti is ahead in 28 tests (47%)
  • there's a draw in 32 tests (53%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.29 66.21
Recency 9 January 2009 27 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm

RTX 3090 Ti has a 22731% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330
Mobility Radeon HD 4330
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 47 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 3404 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4330 or GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.