GeForce G102M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4330 and GeForce G102M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 4330
2009
512 MB GDDR3
0.32

G102M outperforms Mobility HD 4330 by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13741324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.19
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameM92C79
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 January 2009 (16 years ago)8 January 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8016
Core clock speed450 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors242 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data14 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6003.600
Floating-point processing power0.072 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data48
ROPs44
TMUs88
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 1.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsVGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Valorant 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Valorant 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Valorant 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.32 0.40
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm

ATI Mobility HD 4330 has a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce G102M, on the other hand, has a 25% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce G102M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330
Mobility Radeon HD 4330
NVIDIA GeForce G102M
GeForce G102M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 53 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 49 votes

Rate GeForce G102M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4330 or GeForce G102M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.