HD Graphics 400 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 3870 and HD Graphics 400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.


ATI Mobility HD 3870
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 55 Watt
1.24
+19.2%

Mobility HD 3870 outperforms HD Graphics 400 by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10871146
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.7413.35
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameM88Braswell GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2008 (17 years ago)1 April 2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32096
Core clock speed660 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistors666 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate10.567.200
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPS0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs162
TMUs1612
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3L
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed850 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth54.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.3
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Valorant 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Valorant 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Valorant 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Valorant 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Valorant 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 1.04
Recency 4 June 2008 1 April 2015
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 6 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3870 has a 19% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 293% more advanced lithography process, and 817% lower power consumption.

The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 456 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3870 or HD Graphics 400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.