Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs ATI Mobility HD 3670

Place in the ranking	1241	67
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	46.28
Power efficiency	no data	13.46
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	M86	Navi 22
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	7 January 2008 (16 years ago)	17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	120	2560
Core clock speed	680 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	2581 MHz
Number of transistors	378 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	5.440	413.0
Floating-point processing power	0.1632 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	4	64
TMUs	8	160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.7
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−10400%

210−220
+10400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −9900%	300−310 +9900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −10400%	210−220 +10400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −10400%	210−220 +10400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −9900%	400−450 +9900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −10525%	850−900 +10525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −9900%	400−450 +9900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −10793%	3050−3100 +10793%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −9900%	300−310 +9900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −10400%	210−220 +10400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −10400%	210−220 +10400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −9900%	400−450 +9900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −10525%	850−900 +10525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −9900%	400−450 +9900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −10456%	950−1000 +10456%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −10793%	3050−3100 +10793%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −9900%	300−310 +9900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −10400%	210−220 +10400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −10400%	210−220 +10400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −9900%	400−450 +9900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −10525%	850−900 +10525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −9900%	400−450 +9900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −10456%	950−1000 +10456%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −10793%	3050−3100 +10793%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −10733%	650−700 +10733%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −10400%	210−220 +10400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−10400%

210−220
+10400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −9900%	100−105 +9900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−10400%

210−220
+10400%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.44	48.26
Recency	7 January 2008	17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	12 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	250 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3670 has 733.3% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE, on the other hand, has a 10868.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3670 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.