Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs ATI Mobility HD 3670
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 3670 with Radeon RX 6750 GRE, including specs and performance data.
6750 GRE outperforms Mobility HD 3670 by a whopping 9358% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1303 | 91 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 48.74 |
| Power efficiency | 1.23 | 13.98 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | M86 | Navi 22 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 January 2008 (18 years ago) | 17 October 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $549 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 120 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 680 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2581 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 378 million | 17,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 5.440 | 413.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.1632 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 4 | 64 |
| TMUs | 8 | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 18 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−8900%
|
90−95
+8900%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−8900%
|
90−95
+8900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−8650%
|
350−400
+8650%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−9186%
|
650−700
+9186%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−9344%
|
2550−2600
+9344%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 16−18
−9312%
|
1600−1650
+9312%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−8900%
|
90−95
+8900%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−12
−8991%
|
1000−1050
+8991%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−8650%
|
350−400
+8650%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−9186%
|
650−700
+9186%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−8900%
|
450−500
+8900%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−9344%
|
2550−2600
+9344%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−8900%
|
90−95
+8900%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−12
−8991%
|
1000−1050
+8991%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−8650%
|
350−400
+8650%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−9186%
|
650−700
+9186%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−8900%
|
450−500
+8900%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−9344%
|
2550−2600
+9344%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−9233%
|
280−290
+9233%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 2−3
−8900%
|
180−190
+8900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
−8900%
|
450−500
+8900%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−8900%
|
180−190
+8900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−8900%
|
90−95
+8900%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−9186%
|
1300−1350
+9186%
|
| Valorant | 2−3
−8900%
|
180−190
+8900%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−8900%
|
180−190
+8900%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−8900%
|
180−190
+8900%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.48 | 45.40 |
| Recency | 7 January 2008 | 17 October 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 12 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 250 Watt |
ATI Mobility HD 3670 has 733.3% lower power consumption.
RX 6750 GRE, on the other hand, has a 9358.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3670 in performance tests.
Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
