ATI Radeon X800 PRO vs ATI Mobility HD 3650
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 3650 with Radeon X800 PRO, including specs and performance data.
ATI Mobility HD 3650 outperforms ATI X800 PRO by a whopping 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1336 | 1456 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.81 | 0.24 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | R400 (2004−2008) |
| GPU code name | M86 | R423 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 January 2008 (17 years ago) | 1 May 2004 (21 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 120 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 475 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 378 million | 160 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 48 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 4.000 | 5.700 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.12 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 4 | 12 |
| TMUs | 8 | 12 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x Molex |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 9.0b (9_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | N/A | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+117%
|
12−14
−117%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16
+133%
|
6−7
−133%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 10−11
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+117%
|
12−14
−117%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 10−11
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+117%
|
12−14
−117%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dead Island 2 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 0−1 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
| Dead Island 2 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
| Valorant | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Dead Island 2 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.34 | 0.16 |
| Recency | 7 January 2008 | 1 May 2004 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 48 Watt |
ATI Mobility HD 3650 has a 112.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 136.4% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.
The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X800 PRO in performance tests.
Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is a notebook card while Radeon X800 PRO is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
