GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650

Place in the ranking	1294	7
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	48.97
Power efficiency	0.82	19.96
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	M86	AD104
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	7 January 2008 (17 years ago)	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	120	7680
Core clock speed	500 MHz	2310 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2610 MHz
Number of transistors	378 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	285 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.000	626.4
Floating-point processing power	0.12 TFLOPS	40.09 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	80
TMUs	8	240
Tensor Cores	no data	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	285 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	700 MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	22.4 GB/s	504.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.7
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 3650 0.34

RTX 4070 Ti 78.88
+23100%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI Mobility HD 3650 855

RTX 4070 Ti 135624
+15762%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	0−1	231
1440p	0−1	150
4K	-0−1	96

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.46
1440p	no data	5.33
4K	no data	8.32

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −3100%	190−200 +3100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −7767%	236 +7767%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −3100%	190−200 +3100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −3533%	109 +3533%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −9483%	575 +9483%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −3775%	150−160 +3775%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −3100%	190−200 +3100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −3000%	93 +3000%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −2071%	152 +2071%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −7783%	473 +7783%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −2971%	210−220 +2971%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −3775%	150−160 +3775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −3380%	170−180 +3380%
World of Tanks	12−14 −2046%	270−280 +2046%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −3100%	190−200 +3100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2667%	83 +2667%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −2100%	150−160 +2100%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −6733%	410 +6733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −2971%	210−220 +2971%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

−8000%

160−170
+8000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1667%	53 +1667%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −3900%	160−170 +3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −4800%	190−200 +4800%
Valorant	5−6 −8060%	400−450 +8060%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −610%	70−75 +610%
Dota 2	14−16 −1047%	172 +1047%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −1047%	172 +1047%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −20800%	200−210 +20800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −1047%	172 +1047%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	90−95
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −610%	70−75 +610%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1100%	24 +1100%
Dota 2	14−16 −1407%	226 +1407%
Valorant	1−2 −23900%	240−250 +23900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	173 +0%	173 +0%
Valorant	450−500 +0%	450−500 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Dota 2	205 +0%	205 +0%
Fortnite	300−350 +0%	300−350 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	178 +0%	178 +0%
Metro Exodus	163 +0%	163 +0%
Valorant	450−500 +0%	450−500 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Dota 2	243 +0%	243 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Valorant	450−500 +0%	450−500 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	156 +0%	156 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	156 +0%	156 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
World of Tanks	500−550 +0%	500−550 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	280 +0%	280 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Metro Exodus	148 +0%	148 +0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus	84 +0%	84 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	140 +0%	140 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 Ti is 23900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4070 Ti is ahead in 33 tests (53%)
there's a draw in 29 tests (47%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.34	78.88
Recency	7 January 2008	3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	12 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	285 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3650 has 850% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 23100% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1275% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.