GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 3650 and GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 3650
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 30 Watt
0.32

RTX 3050 A Mobile outperforms Mobility HD 3650 by a whopping 8141% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1365244
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.8345.38
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameM86GA106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2008 (17 years ago)2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1201792
Core clock speed500 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1343 MHz
Number of transistors378 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00075.21
Floating-point processing power0.12 TFLOPS4.813 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs856
Tensor Coresno data56
Ray Tracing Coresno data14
L1 Cacheno data1.8 MB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−7757%
550−600
+7757%
Valorant 24−27
−7977%
2100−2150
+7977%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−8114%
1150−1200
+8114%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
Dota 2 10−11
−7900%
800−850
+7900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−7757%
550−600
+7757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
Valorant 24−27
−7977%
2100−2150
+7977%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
Dota 2 10−11
−7900%
800−850
+7900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−7757%
550−600
+7757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
Valorant 24−27
−7977%
2100−2150
+7977%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−7900%
160−170
+7900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−7900%
240−250
+7900%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−8114%
1150−1200
+8114%
Valorant 2−3
−7900%
160−170
+7900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−7900%
160−170
+7900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−7900%
160−170
+7900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.32 26.37
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 45 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3650 has 50% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 A Mobile, on the other hand, has a 8140.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 42 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 34 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3650 or GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.