GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 3650 and GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
1060 Max-Q 6 GB outperforms Mobility HD 3650 by a whopping 4281% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1366 | 401 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.82 | 13.52 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | M86 | GP106 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 7 January 2008 (17 years ago) | 27 June 2017 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 120 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1063 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1480 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 378 million | 4,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 4.000 | 118.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.12 TFLOPS | 3.789 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 48 |
| TMUs | 8 | 80 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 480 KB |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 1536 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
| Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | 2002 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB/s | 192.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | - | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 1−2
−8000%
| 81
+8000%
|
| 4K | 0−1 | 28 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−1400%
|
60−65
+1400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−1229%
|
93
+1229%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−362%
|
120−130
+362%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16
−1286%
|
190−200
+1286%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−11
−810%
|
90−95
+810%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−1400%
|
60−65
+1400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−1129%
|
86
+1129%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−1220%
|
66
+1220%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−362%
|
120−130
+362%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−11
−810%
|
90−95
+810%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−1400%
|
60−65
+1400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−800%
|
63
+800%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−600%
|
35
+600%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−362%
|
120−130
+362%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−833%
|
27−30
+833%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−4400%
|
130−140
+4400%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Escape from Tarkov | 2−3
−1350%
|
27−30
+1350%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−2000%
|
21−24
+2000%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−286%
|
54
+286%
|
| Valorant | 2−3
−3850%
|
75−80
+3850%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−1200%
|
13
+1200%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−600%
|
14−16
+600%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 70
+0%
|
70
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 133
+0%
|
133
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65
+0%
|
65
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 116
+0%
|
116
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 84
+0%
|
84
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 48
+0%
|
48
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 73
+0%
|
73
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24
+0%
|
24
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20
+0%
|
20
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
This is how ATI Mobility HD 3650 and GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB compete in popular games:
- GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB is 8000% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB is 4400% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB performs better in 27 tests (44%)
- there's a draw in 35 tests (56%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.32 | 14.02 |
| Recency | 7 January 2008 | 27 June 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 6 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 80 Watt |
ATI Mobility HD 3650 has 166.7% lower power consumption.
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB, on the other hand, has a 4281.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 243.8% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
