HD Graphics (Braswell) vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT and HD Graphics (Braswell), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 2600 XT
2007
256 MB GDDR3
0.32

HD Graphics (Braswell) outperforms Mobility HD 2600 XT by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13821274
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Gen. 8 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameM76Braswell
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 May 2007 (18 years ago)1 April 2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12016
Core clock speed680 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data700 MHz
Number of transistors390 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Texture fill rate5.440no data
Floating-point processing power0.1632 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth24 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)11.2
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI Mobility HD 2600 XT 0.32
HD Graphics (Braswell) 0.57
+78.1%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI Mobility HD 2600 XT 1159
HD Graphics (Braswell) 1479
+27.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Valorant 24−27
−7.7%
27−30
+7.7%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−7.7%
27−30
+7.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−7.7%
27−30
+7.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 3−4
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
High

Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the HD Graphics (Braswell) is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD Graphics (Braswell) performs better in 17 tests (65%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (35%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.32 0.57
Recency 14 May 2007 1 April 2015
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm

HD Graphics (Braswell) has a 78% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics (Braswell) is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 18 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Braswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT or HD Graphics (Braswell), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.