Arc Pro A30M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT with Arc Pro A30M, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 2600 XT
2007
256 MB GDDR3
0.31

Pro A30M outperforms Mobility HD 2600 XT by a whopping 4365% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1374402
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.55
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameM76DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date14 May 2007 (18 years ago)8 August 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1201024
Core clock speed680 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors390 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate5.440128.0
Floating-point processing power0.1632 TFLOPS4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L2 Cache64 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth24 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Valorant 24−27
−4323%
1150−1200
+4323%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−4186%
600−650
+4186%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Dota 2 9−10
−4344%
400−450
+4344%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−4300%
220−230
+4300%
Valorant 24−27
−4323%
1150−1200
+4323%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Dota 2 9−10
−4344%
400−450
+4344%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−4300%
220−230
+4300%
Valorant 24−27
−4323%
1150−1200
+4323%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−4186%
600−650
+4186%
Valorant 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 13.84
Recency 14 May 2007 8 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm

Arc Pro A30M has a 4364.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro A30M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro A30M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
Intel Arc Pro A30M
Arc Pro A30M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Arc Pro A30M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT or Arc Pro A30M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.