ATI All-In-Wonder X800 GT vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameM18R430
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 July 2004 (21 years ago)21 September 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12no data
Core clock speed350 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed350 MHzno data
Number of transistors160 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm110 nm
Texture fill rate2.8003.200
ROPs88
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz490 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s15.68 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)9.0b (9_2)
OpenGL2.02.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2004 21 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 110 nm

ATI Mobility 9800 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI All-In-Wonder X800 GT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and a 18% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon 9800 and All-In-Wonder X800 GT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon 9800 is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder X800 GT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon 9800 or All-In-Wonder X800 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.