ATI All-In-Wonder X800 GT vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameRS300R430
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 June 2003 (22 years ago)21 September 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3no data
Core clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistors76 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm110 nm
Texture fill rate0.63.200
ROPs28
TMUs28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared490 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data15.68 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.19.0b (9_2)
OpenGL1.42.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 June 2003 21 September 2004
Chip lithography 150 nm 110 nm

ATI All-In-Wonder X800 GT has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 36% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP and All-In-Wonder X800 GT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder X800 GT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 11 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP or All-In-Wonder X800 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.