NVS 810 vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated832
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.21
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameM9+GM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2003 (22 years ago)4 November 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5512 ×2
Core clock speed200 MHz902 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHz1033 MHz
Number of transistors36 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data68 Watt
Texture fill rate0.833.06 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data1.058 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs416 ×2
TMUs432 ×2
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data198 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 MB2 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed230 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.72 GB/s14.4 GB/s ×2
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs8x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 4 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

NVS 810 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon 9200 and NVS 810. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon 9200 is a notebook graphics card while NVS 810 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon 9200
Mobility Radeon 9200
NVIDIA NVS 810
NVS 810

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon 9200 or NVS 810, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.