Radeon Pro 580X vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility FireGL V5700 and Radeon Pro 580X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
2008
512 MB GDDR3
0.34

Pro 580X outperforms Mobility V5700 by a whopping 5203% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1360340
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.25
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameM86Polaris 20
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2008 (18 years ago)18 March 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1202304
Core clock speed600 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors378 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800172.8
Floating-point processing power0.144 TFLOPS5.53 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs8144
L1 Cacheno data576 KB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1695 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s217.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−5100%
260−270
+5100%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−5150%
210−220
+5150%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−5100%
260−270
+5100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4900%
350−400
+4900%
Valorant 24−27
−5092%
1350−1400
+5092%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−4900%
700−750
+4900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
Dota 2 10−11
−4900%
500−550
+4900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−5150%
210−220
+5150%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−5100%
260−270
+5100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4900%
350−400
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−5100%
260−270
+5100%
Valorant 24−27
−5092%
1350−1400
+5092%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
Dota 2 10−11
−4900%
500−550
+4900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−5150%
210−220
+5150%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−5100%
260−270
+5100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4900%
350−400
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−5100%
260−270
+5100%
Valorant 24−27
−5092%
1350−1400
+5092%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−5150%
210−220
+5150%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−4900%
700−750
+4900%
Valorant 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 18.03
Recency 7 January 2008 18 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm

Pro 580X has a 5202.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 580X is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility FireGL V5700 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Mobility FireGL V5700
AMD Radeon Pro 580X
Radeon Pro 580X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Mobility FireGL V5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 92 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 580X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility FireGL V5700 or Radeon Pro 580X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.