RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5700

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility FireGL V5700 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
2008
512 MB GDDR3
0.34

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Mobility V5700 by a whopping 15482% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking135164
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data36.99
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameM86AD104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2008 (17 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1207424
Core clock speed600 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors378 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data110 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800386.3
Floating-point processing power0.144 TFLOPS24.72 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs8232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58
L1 Cacheno data7.3 MB
L2 Cache128 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−14900%
600−650
+14900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14900%
1050−1100
+14900%
Valorant 24−27
−15477%
4050−4100
+15477%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−15257%
2150−2200
+15257%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
Dota 2 10−11
−15400%
1550−1600
+15400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−14900%
600−650
+14900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14900%
1050−1100
+14900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−14900%
750−800
+14900%
Valorant 24−27
−15477%
4050−4100
+15477%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
Dota 2 10−11
−15400%
1550−1600
+15400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−14900%
600−650
+14900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14900%
1050−1100
+14900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−14900%
750−800
+14900%
Valorant 24−27
−15477%
4050−4100
+15477%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−14900%
600−650
+14900%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−14900%
300−310
+14900%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−15257%
2150−2200
+15257%
Valorant 2−3
−14900%
300−310
+14900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−14900%
300−310
+14900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 52.98
Recency 7 January 2008 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 15482.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility FireGL V5700 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Mobility FireGL V5700
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Mobility FireGL V5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 32 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility FireGL V5700 or RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.