Quadro P4200 vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5700

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility FireGL V5700 and Quadro P4200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
2008
512 MB GDDR3
0.34

P4200 outperforms ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 by a whopping 7321% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1300216
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data17.37
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameM86GP104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2008 (17 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1202304
Core clock speed600 MHz1227 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1647 MHz
Number of transistors378 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800237.2
Floating-point processing power0.144 TFLOPS7.589 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s192.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−488%
45−50
+488%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−488%
45−50
+488%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2120%
110−120
+2120%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−488%
45−50
+488%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1183%
75−80
+1183%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2120%
110−120
+2120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2157%
150−160
+2157%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1540%
80−85
+1540%
World of Tanks 12−14
−1892%
250−260
+1892%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−488%
45−50
+488%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1183%
75−80
+1183%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2120%
110−120
+2120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2157%
150−160
+2157%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−8650%
170−180
+8650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1750%
70−75
+1750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%
Valorant 5−6
−1260%
65−70
+1260%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−7600%
75−80
+7600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 24−27
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Dota 2 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%
Valorant 1−2
−3200%
30−35
+3200%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Elden Ring 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Elden Ring 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
World of Tanks 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Elden Ring 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 8650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is ahead in 32 tests (52%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (48%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 25.23
Recency 7 January 2008 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 16 nm

Quadro P4200 has a 7320.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 243.8% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility FireGL V5700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Mobility FireGL V5700
NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Mobility FireGL V5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 57 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.