P102-100 vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility FireGL V5700 with P102-100, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
2008
512 MB GDDR3
0.34

P102-100 outperforms Mobility V5700 by a whopping 2424% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1360541
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.92
Power efficiencyno data2.64
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameM86GP102
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date7 January 2008 (18 years ago)12 February 2018 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1203200
Core clock speed600 MHz1582 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1683 MHz
Number of transistors378 million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800336.6
Floating-point processing power0.144 TFLOPS10.77 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs8200
L1 Cacheno data1.2 MB
L2 Cache128 KB2.5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB5 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1376 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s440.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2329%
170−180
+2329%
Valorant 24−27
−2400%
650−700
+2400%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−2400%
350−400
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Dota 2 10−11
−2400%
250−260
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2329%
170−180
+2329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
Valorant 24−27
−2400%
650−700
+2400%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Dota 2 10−11
−2400%
250−260
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2329%
170−180
+2329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
Valorant 24−27
−2400%
650−700
+2400%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−2400%
350−400
+2400%
Valorant 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 8.58
Recency 7 January 2008 12 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 5 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 16 nm

P102-100 has a 2424% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 244% more advanced lithography process.

The P102-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility FireGL V5700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility FireGL V5700 is a mobile workstation graphics card while P102-100 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Mobility FireGL V5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 41 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility FireGL V5700 or P102-100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.