GeForce GT 1010 vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility FireGL V5700 with GeForce GT 1010, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
2008
512 MB GDDR3
0.34

GT 1010 outperforms Mobility V5700 by a whopping 582% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1358900
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.95
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameM86GP108
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date7 January 2008 (18 years ago)13 January 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120256
Core clock speed600 MHz1228 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1468 MHz
Number of transistors378 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt
Texture fill rate4.80023.49
Floating-point processing power0.144 TFLOPS0.7516 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs816
L1 Cacheno data32 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data147 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s40.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Valorant 24−27
−554%
170−180
+554%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−579%
95−100
+579%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Dota 2 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Valorant 24−27
−554%
170−180
+554%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Dota 2 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Valorant 24−27
−554%
170−180
+554%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−579%
95−100
+579%
Valorant 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 2.32
Recency 7 January 2008 13 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm

GT 1010 has a 582.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 1010 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility FireGL V5700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility FireGL V5700 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 1010 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Mobility FireGL V5700
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010
GeForce GT 1010

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Mobility FireGL V5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 566 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility FireGL V5700 or GeForce GT 1010, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.