Radeon 820M vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) and Radeon 820M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
820M outperforms Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 780 | 672 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Maxwell (2014−2017) | RDNA 3+ (2024) |
| GPU code name | Surface Book | Krackan Point |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 October 2015 (10 years ago) | 2 June 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 2900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 4 nm |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 7500 MHz |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0 | no data |
| CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 28
−42.9%
| 40−45
+42.9%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−61.5%
|
21−24
+61.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−50%
|
14−16
+50%
|
| Fortnite | 18−20
−57.9%
|
30−33
+57.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
−35.3%
|
21−24
+35.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−26.7%
|
18−20
+26.7%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−61.5%
|
21−24
+61.5%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 60−65
−36.5%
|
85−90
+36.5%
|
| Dota 2 | 30−35
−40.6%
|
45−50
+40.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−50%
|
14−16
+50%
|
| Fortnite | 18−20
−57.9%
|
30−33
+57.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
−35.3%
|
21−24
+35.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 10−11
−70%
|
16−18
+70%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
−50%
|
9−10
+50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−26.7%
|
18−20
+26.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
−27.3%
|
14−16
+27.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−61.5%
|
21−24
+61.5%
|
| Dota 2 | 30−35
−40.6%
|
45−50
+40.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−50%
|
14−16
+50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
−35.3%
|
21−24
+35.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−26.7%
|
18−20
+26.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
−27.3%
|
14−16
+27.3%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 18−20
−57.9%
|
30−33
+57.9%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 24−27
−46.2%
|
35−40
+46.2%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−50%
|
12−14
+50%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 10−11
−40%
|
14−16
+40%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−75%
|
7−8
+75%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
4K
High
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 0−1 | 0−1 |
This is how Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) and Radeon 820M compete in popular games:
- Radeon 820M is 43% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 820M is 100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Radeon 820M performs better in 30 tests (54%)
- there's a draw in 26 tests (46%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.34 | 4.89 |
| Recency | 1 October 2015 | 2 June 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 4 nm |
Radeon 820M has a 46.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon 820M is our recommended choice as it beats the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
