Radeon Instinct MI250X vs Matrox Marvel G200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG200 (1998−1999)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameEclipseAldebaran
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1998 (26 years ago)8 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data14080
Core clock speed84 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors10 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data500 Watt
Texture fill rate0.081,496
Floating-point processing powerno data47.87 TFLOPS
ROPs1no data
TMUs1880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 4.0 x16
Length150 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount8 MB128 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed112 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth896.0 MB/s3,277 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.0N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLNoneN/A
OpenCLNone3.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 MB 128 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 6 nm

Instinct MI250X has a 1638300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 5733.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Marvel G200 and Radeon Instinct MI250X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Marvel G200 is a desktop card while Radeon Instinct MI250X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Marvel G200
Marvel G200
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
Radeon Instinct MI250X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 20 votes

Rate Matrox Marvel G200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 123 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI250X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.