GeForce 8800 GTS 112 vs Matrox G450 x4 MMS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG400 (1999−2002)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameCondorG80
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 January 2001 (24 years ago)19 November 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data112
Core clock speed125 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors10 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rate0.2528.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs220
TMUs228
L2 Cacheno data80 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 MB640 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed332 MBps800 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLNone3.3
OpenCLNone1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2001 19 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 640 MB
Chip lithography 180 nm 90 nm

8800 GTS 112 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox G450 x4 MMS and GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox G450 x4 MMS
G450 x4 MMS
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 11 votes

Rate Matrox G450 x4 MMS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 309 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox G450 x4 MMS or GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.