UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe MAX Graphics with UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake), including specs and performance data.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2020
4 GB LPDDR4X, 25 Watt
5.13
+55.5%

Iris Xe MAX Graphics outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking626743
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.13no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameDG1Rocket Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date31 October 2020 (4 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76832
Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz1450 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate79.20no data
Floating-point processing power2.534 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR4Xno data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2133 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth68.26 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 5.13
+55.5%
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 3.30

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 8214
+192%
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 2811

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 6333
+191%
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 2175

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 36993
+227%
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 11315

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 177442
+250%
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 50628

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 1743
+175%
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 634

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
+42.1%
19
−42.1%
1440p20
+33.3%
15
−33.3%
4K16
+60%
10
−60%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Elden Ring 12−14
+0%
13
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 39
+160%
15
−160%
Metro Exodus 23
+283%
6−7
−283%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+200%
10−12
−200%
Valorant 29
+867%
3−4
−867%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Dota 2 27
+125%
12
−125%
Elden Ring 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Far Cry 5 29
+81.3%
16
−81.3%
Fortnite 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Forza Horizon 4 33
+175%
12
−175%
Grand Theft Auto V 20
+122%
9−10
−122%
Metro Exodus 18
+200%
6−7
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Valorant 15
+400%
3−4
−400%
World of Tanks 80−85
+44.8%
55−60
−44.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Dota 2 38
+18.8%
32
−18.8%
Far Cry 5 42
+133%
18−20
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 29
+123%
13
−123%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
Valorant 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Elden Ring 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+43.5%
21−24
−43.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
World of Tanks 35−40
+60.9%
21−24
−60.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+900%
2−3
−900%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Valorant 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Elden Ring 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 20
+66.7%
12
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 11
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Valorant 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

This is how Iris Xe MAX Graphics and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 42% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 33% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 60% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 1000% faster.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 22% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is ahead in 52 tests (88%)
  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.13 3.30
Recency 31 October 2020 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm

Iris Xe MAX Graphics has a 55.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 272 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.