Radeon PRO V710 vs Iris Xe Graphics MAX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking623not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.01no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG1Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 October 2020 (4 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683456
Core clock speedno data1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate79.20432.0
Floating-point processing power2.534 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs2496
TMUs48216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR4XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB28 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed4.3 GB/s2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.26 GB/s504.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.21.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 October 2020 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 28 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 158 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics MAX has 532% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 600% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics MAX and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics MAX is a desktop card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 211 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics MAX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.