Radeon Sky 900 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking485not rated
Place by popularity19not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeTahiti
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)27 March 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores963584 ×2
Core clock speedno data825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data950 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data106.4 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data3.405 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data32 ×2
TMUsno data112 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB ×2
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data480 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Dual-link DVI support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 27 March 2013
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G7 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon Sky 900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Sky 900 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
AMD Radeon Sky 900
Radeon Sky 900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 2965 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Sky 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G7 or Radeon Sky 900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.