Radeon RX 6500 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon RX 6500, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX 6500 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 397 | 265 |
| Place by popularity | 16 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | no data |
| GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 (3 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR4 | no data |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
−77.3%
|
35−40
+77.3%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 30−35
−91.2%
|
65−70
+91.2%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24
−81.8%
|
40−45
+81.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
−84%
|
45−50
+84%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 30−33
−76.7%
|
50−55
+76.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
−73.1%
|
90−95
+73.1%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 45−50
−73.3%
|
75−80
+73.3%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−33
−80%
|
50−55
+80%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−35
−93.9%
|
60−65
+93.9%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
−77.3%
|
35−40
+77.3%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 30−35
−91.2%
|
65−70
+91.2%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24
−81.8%
|
40−45
+81.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
−84%
|
45−50
+84%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 30−33
−76.7%
|
50−55
+76.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
−73.1%
|
90−95
+73.1%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 45−50
−73.3%
|
75−80
+73.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
−94.1%
|
65−70
+94.1%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−33
−80%
|
50−55
+80%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−35
−93.9%
|
60−65
+93.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
−95.5%
|
40−45
+95.5%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
−77.3%
|
35−40
+77.3%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 30−35
−91.2%
|
65−70
+91.2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
−84%
|
45−50
+84%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 30−33
−76.7%
|
50−55
+76.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
−73.1%
|
90−95
+73.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
−95.5%
|
40−45
+95.5%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
−92.3%
|
24−27
+92.3%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
−81.8%
|
40−45
+81.8%
|
| Metro Exodus | 16−18
−131%
|
35−40
+131%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
−83.3%
|
30−35
+83.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 14−16
−167%
|
40−45
+167%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−11
−100%
|
20−22
+100%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
−81%
|
35−40
+81%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16−18
−94.1%
|
30−35
+94.1%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20
−117%
|
35−40
+117%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
−95%
|
35−40
+95%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6
−120%
|
10−12
+120%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−100%
|
21−24
+100%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
−72.7%
|
18−20
+72.7%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11
−70%
|
16−18
+70%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−117%
|
12−14
+117%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−150%
|
20−22
+150%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7
−100%
|
12−14
+100%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−90%
|
18−20
+90%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−83.3%
|
10−12
+83.3%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 8−9
−87.5%
|
14−16
+87.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−92.9%
|
27−30
+92.9%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
−93.8%
|
30−35
+93.8%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18−20
−88.9%
|
30−35
+88.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
−93.8%
|
30−35
+93.8%
|
| Hitman 3 | 21−24
−85.7%
|
35−40
+85.7%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−96.7%
|
55−60
+96.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18−20
−88.9%
|
30−35
+88.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
−93.8%
|
30−35
+93.8%
|
| Hitman 3 | 21−24
−85.7%
|
35−40
+85.7%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−96.7%
|
55−60
+96.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18−20
−88.9%
|
30−35
+88.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
−93.8%
|
30−35
+93.8%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−96.7%
|
55−60
+96.7%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Hitman 3 | 12−14
−91.7%
|
21−24
+91.7%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 9−10
−100%
|
18−20
+100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−120%
|
10−12
+120%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 7−8
−85.7%
|
12−14
+85.7%
|
4K
High Preset
| Hitman 3 | 8−9
−87.5%
|
14−16
+87.5%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6
−100%
|
10−11
+100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 4−5
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6500 is 167% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RX 6500 surpassed Iris Xe Graphics G7 in all 47 of our tests.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
