Quadro FX 4800 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 with Quadro FX 4800, including specs and performance data.

Iris Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.60
+314%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms FX 4800 by a whopping 314% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking436828
Place by popularity18not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.05
Power efficiencyno data1.17
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGT200B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)11 November 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96192
Core clock speedno data602 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data38.53
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPsno data24
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1536 MB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%
Fortnite 60−65
+343%
14−16
−343%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+320%
10−11
−320%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+350%
18−20
−350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+367%
6−7
−367%
Valorant 40−45
+344%
9−10
−344%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Dota 2 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%
Fortnite 60−65
+343%
14−16
−343%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+320%
10−11
−320%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+350%
18−20
−350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+367%
6−7
−367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+357%
7−8
−357%
Valorant 40−45
+344%
9−10
−344%
World of Tanks 150−160
+331%
35−40
−331%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Dota 2 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+320%
10−11
−320%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+350%
18−20
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+357%
7−8
−357%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+343%
14−16
−343%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Valorant 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Valorant 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Dota 2 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+343%
7−8
−343%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.60 2.56
Recency 15 August 2020 11 November 2008
Chip lithography 10 nm 55 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G7 has a 314.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 4800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while Quadro FX 4800 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Quadro FX 4800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2625 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 67 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.