GeForce GTX 285 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 with GeForce GTX 285, including specs and performance data.

Iris Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.71
+173%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms GTX 285 by a whopping 173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking397661
Place by popularity16not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.64
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGT200B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (3 years ago)23 December 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$359
Current priceno data$98 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96240
CUDA coresno data240
Core clock speedno data648 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data204 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rateno data51.8 billion/sec
Floating-point performanceno data708.5 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Iris Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce GTX 285 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI optionsno data+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data512 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1242 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data159.0 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataHDTVTwo Dual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMIno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)no data128bit
Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkanno dataN/A
CUDAno data+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+173%
21−24
−173%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+165%
30−35
−165%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+173%
21−24
−173%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+160%
24−27
−160%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+167%
30−33
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+169%
50−55
−169%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+167%
45−50
−167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+167%
30−33
−167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+173%
30−35
−173%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+173%
21−24
−173%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+165%
30−35
−165%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+173%
21−24
−173%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+160%
24−27
−160%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+167%
30−33
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+169%
50−55
−169%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+167%
45−50
−167%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+165%
30−35
−165%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+167%
30−33
−167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+173%
30−35
−173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+173%
21−24
−173%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+173%
21−24
−173%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+165%
30−35
−165%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+160%
24−27
−160%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+167%
30−33
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+169%
50−55
−169%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+173%
21−24
−173%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+169%
12−14
−169%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+173%
21−24
−173%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+150%
18−20
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+167%
14−16
−167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+162%
21−24
−162%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+165%
16−18
−165%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+150%
18−20
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+150%
20−22
−150%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+173%
10−12
−173%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+173%
10−12
−173%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.71 3.92
Recency 15 August 2020 23 December 2008
Chip lithography 10 nm 55 nm

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 285 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 285 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
GeForce GTX 285

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2200 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 108 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.