Radeon R9 M380 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
VS
Radeon R9 M380 Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition Radeon R9 M385 Radeon R9 M385X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R9 M380, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
2020
28 Watt
9.16
+27.8%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs outperforms R9 M380 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
R9 M380 R9 M380

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking484551
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.57no data
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeStrato
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96768
Core clock speed400 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data48.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.536 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+
Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1DirectX® 12
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno dataNot Listed
Mantle-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
1440p16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
4K12
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 26
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Counter-Strike 2 15
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 18
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 41
+41.4%
27−30
−41.4%
Counter-Strike 2 13
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 26
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Fortnite 30
−36.7%
40−45
+36.7%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Forza Horizon 5 22
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+24%
24−27
−24%
Valorant 124
+69.9%
70−75
−69.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 35
+20.7%
27−30
−20.7%
Counter-Strike 2 12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 96
−14.6%
110−120
+14.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Dota 2 51
−3.9%
50−55
+3.9%
Far Cry 5 25
+19%
21−24
−19%
Fortnite 21
−95.2%
40−45
+95.2%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
−47.1%
24−27
+47.1%
Metro Exodus 15
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+24%
24−27
−24%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Valorant 112
+53.4%
70−75
−53.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30
+3.4%
27−30
−3.4%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Dota 2 47
−12.8%
50−55
+12.8%
Far Cry 5 23
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Forza Horizon 5 22
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+24%
24−27
−24%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Valorant 23
−217%
70−75
+217%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 15
−173%
40−45
+173%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+26.9%
50−55
−26.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Valorant 95−100
+26%
75−80
−26%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 8
−125%
18−20
+125%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+140%
5−6
−140%
Valorant 45−50
+32.4%
30−35
−32.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 20
−20%
24−27
+20%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and R9 M380 compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 29% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 33% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 33% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 200% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M380 is 217% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is ahead in 49 tests (73%)
  • R9 M380 is ahead in 17 tests (25%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.16 7.17
Recency 15 August 2020 5 May 2015
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has a 27.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M380 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
AMD Radeon R9 M380
Radeon R9 M380
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
HD 7970M Radeon HD 7970M
R9 M380 Radeon R9 M380
vs
GTX 770M GeForce GTX 770M
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
GTX 870M GeForce GTX 870M
UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G1
vs
FX 5600 5600
RX 5300 AMD RX 5300
vs
RTX A4000H A4000H
RTX 3070 NVIDIA RTX 3070
vs
Graphics (Ryzen 9000) Graphics (Ryzen 9000)
RTX 3070 NVIDIA RTX 3070
vs
Apple M4 16-core GPU core GPU
RTX 3070 SUPER GeForce RTX 3070 SUPER
vs
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Intel Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
HD 8550G 8550G
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Intel Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
HD 6470M 6470M
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Intel Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
ATI RG220 RG220
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
vs
RX 6850M XT 6850M XT
RTX 3080 Mobile NVIDIA RTX 3080 Mobile
vs
FX 5700 EP 5700 EP

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 1005 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 11 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs or Radeon R9 M380, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.