Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
2020
28 Watt
7.94
+530%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs outperforms R5 (Stoney Ridge) by a whopping 530% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4921006
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.472.22
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeStoney Ridge
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96192
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1350 MHz800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt12-45 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (FL 12_0)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 7.94
+530%
R5 (Stoney Ridge) 1.26

  • Other tests
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
    • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
    • 3DMark Time Spy Graphics

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 6504
+415%
R5 (Stoney Ridge) 1264

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 25978
+676%
R5 (Stoney Ridge) 3346

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 5139
+566%
R5 (Stoney Ridge) 772

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 26982
+467%
R5 (Stoney Ridge) 4755

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 208639
+306%
R5 (Stoney Ridge) 51382

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 1560
+513%
R5 (Stoney Ridge) 255

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
+238%
8
−238%
1440p15
+650%
2−3
−650%
4K12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+543%
7−8
−543%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+533%
3−4
−533%
Hogwarts Legacy 28
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Battlefield 5 41
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+543%
7−8
−543%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+433%
3−4
−433%
Far Cry 5 26
+2500%
1
−2500%
Fortnite 30
+329%
7
−329%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+660%
5
−660%
Forza Horizon 5 35
+600%
5−6
−600%
Hogwarts Legacy 16
+700%
2−3
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+210%
10−11
−210%
Valorant 124
+265%
30−35
−265%
Battlefield 5 35
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+543%
7−8
−543%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 96
+220%
30−33
−220%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+333%
3−4
−333%
Dota 2 51
+200%
16−18
−200%
Far Cry 5 25
+733%
3−4
−733%
Fortnite 21
+425%
4−5
−425%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+443%
7−8
−443%
Forza Horizon 5 31
+675%
4−5
−675%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Hogwarts Legacy 11
+450%
2−3
−450%
Metro Exodus 15
+1400%
1
−1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+210%
10−11
−210%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+400%
6−7
−400%
Valorant 112
+229%
30−35
−229%
Battlefield 5 30
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+267%
3−4
−267%
Dota 2 47
+176%
16−18
−176%
Far Cry 5 23
+667%
3−4
−667%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+443%
7−8
−443%
Hogwarts Legacy 8
+300%
2−3
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+210%
10−11
−210%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+133%
6−7
−133%
Valorant 23
−47.8%
30−35
+47.8%
Fortnite 15
+275%
4−5
−275%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+633%
9−10
−633%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+231%
12−14
−231%
Valorant 95−100
+1517%
6−7
−1517%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 16
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Fortnite 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 8
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 0−1
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Valorant 45−50
+543%
7−8
−543%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 20
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Fortnite 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and R5 (Stoney Ridge) compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 238% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 650% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 1100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 2500% faster.
  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the R5 (Stoney Ridge) is 88% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is ahead in 43 tests (96%)
  • R5 (Stoney Ridge) is ahead in 2 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.94 1.26
Recency 15 August 2020 1 June 2016
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 12 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has a 530.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

R5 (Stoney Ridge), on the other hand, has 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6
1011 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2
71 vote

Rate Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs or Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.