Radeon HD 6770 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs with Radeon HD 6770, including specs and performance data.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
2020
28 Watt
9.43
+192%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs outperforms HD 6770 by a whopping 192% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking437706
Place by popularity81not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.24
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeJuniper
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date15 August 2020 (3 years ago)21 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$129
Current priceno data$150 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96800
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1350 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt108 Watt
Texture fill rateno data34.00
Floating-point performanceno data1,360.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon HD 6770 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data198 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1050 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Eyefinityno data1
HDMIno data+
DisplayPort supportno data-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAccelerationno data-
CrossFireno data1
Endurono data-
HD3Dno data-
PowerTuneno data-
TrueAudiono data-
ZeroCoreno data-
Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1DirectX® 11
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Mantleno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 9.43
+192%
HD 6770 3.23

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs outperforms Radeon HD 6770 by 192% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 5139
+238%
HD 6770 1520

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs outperforms Radeon HD 6770 by 238% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
+225%
8−9
−225%
1440p16
+220%
5−6
−220%
4K12
+200%
4−5
−200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+175%
20
−175%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+173%
22
−173%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+186%
21
−186%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+176%
27−30
−176%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+178%
36
−178%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+181%
16
−181%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+173%
21−24
−173%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+188%
24−27
−188%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+183%
45−50
−183%
Hitman 3 70−75
+192%
24
−192%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+183%
46
−183%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+186%
35
−186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+165%
17
−165%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+189%
38
−189%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+173%
22
−173%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+189%
19
−189%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+178%
18
−178%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+176%
27−30
−176%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+181%
32
−181%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+169%
13
−169%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+173%
21−24
−173%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+188%
24−27
−188%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+183%
45−50
−183%
Hitman 3 60−65
+173%
22
−173%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−310
+168%
112
−168%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+186%
28
−186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+167%
15
−167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+183%
30
−183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+183%
30
−183%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+186%
84
−186%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+186%
14
−186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+183%
23
−183%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+173%
11
−173%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+173%
21−24
−173%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+183%
45−50
−183%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+183%
23
−183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
+192%
24
−192%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+186%
14
−186%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+179%
30−35
−179%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+186%
14
−186%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+167%
14−16
−167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+173%
10−12
−173%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+157%
7
−157%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+181%
16
−181%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+165%
16−18
−165%
Hitman 3 35−40
+169%
12−14
−169%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+175%
20−22
−175%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+169%
12−14
−169%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+189%
19
−189%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+181%
16−18
−181%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Hitman 3 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+192%
12
−192%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%

This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and HD 6770 compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 225% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 220% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 200% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.43 3.23
Recency 15 August 2020 21 January 2011
Chip lithography 10 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 108 Watt

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a notebook card while Radeon HD 6770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
AMD Radeon HD 6770
Radeon HD 6770

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 820 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 326 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.