Radeon HD 6620G vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon HD 6620G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
2020
28 Watt
9.00
+934%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs outperforms HD 6620G by a whopping 934% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4841136
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.571.73
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeSumo
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)7 December 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96400
Core clock speed400 MHz444 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data8.880
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3552 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 9.00
+934%
HD 6620G 0.87

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 6504
+901%
HD 6620G 650

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 25978
+964%
HD 6620G 2443

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
+108%
13
−108%
1440p16
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
4K12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 26
+767%
3−4
−767%
Counter-Strike 2 15
+114%
7−8
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+850%
2−3
−850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 18
+500%
3−4
−500%
Battlefield 5 41
+1267%
3−4
−1267%
Counter-Strike 2 13
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+700%
2−3
−700%
Far Cry 5 26
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Fortnite 30
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+660%
5−6
−660%
Forza Horizon 5 22
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
Valorant 124
+313%
30−33
−313%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12
+300%
3−4
−300%
Battlefield 5 35
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Counter-Strike 2 12
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 96
+336%
21−24
−336%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+550%
2−3
−550%
Dota 2 51
+264%
14−16
−264%
Far Cry 5 25
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Fortnite 21
+950%
2−3
−950%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+660%
5−6
−660%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Metro Exodus 15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+500%
5−6
−500%
Valorant 112
+273%
30−33
−273%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+450%
2−3
−450%
Dota 2 47
+236%
14−16
−236%
Far Cry 5 23
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+660%
5−6
−660%
Forza Horizon 5 22
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+180%
5−6
−180%
Valorant 23
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+1550%
4−5
−1550%
Grand Theft Auto V 7 0−1
Metro Exodus 9−10 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+780%
5−6
−780%
Valorant 95−100
+978%
9−10
−978%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 7 0−1
Far Cry 5 16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 8
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Valorant 45−50
+800%
5−6
−800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 20
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1

This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and HD 6620G compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 108% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 1500% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 1100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1440p resolution and the Epic Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 1700% faster.
  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the HD 6620G is 88% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is ahead in 35 tests (95%)
  • HD 6620G is ahead in 2 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.00 0.87
Recency 15 August 2020 7 December 2011
Chip lithography 10 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 35 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has a 934.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6620G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
AMD Radeon HD 6620G
Radeon HD 6620G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1005 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 90 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6620G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs or Radeon HD 6620G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.