Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking536not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.17no data
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Gen. 3 (2005)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGMA 950
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)1 March 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores964
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1350 MHz250 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt7 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 1 March 2005
Chip lithography 10 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 7 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950, on the other hand, has 300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1104 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 83 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.