Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking468not rated
Place by popularity86not in top-100
Power efficiency23.19no data
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Gen. 4.5 (2008)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeMontevina
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9610
Core clock speed400 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology10 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Wattno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_110

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 26982
+18508%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD 145

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 10 nm 65 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 981 vote

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 229 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.